It is amazing the balls of these religious screw up in science
these days. Oh they call themselves researchers but they are so full of
complete crap. Indeed these religious biased scientists look at results
and often modify the findings to fit their religious belief systems.
Recently in looking as some well known research in a particular area of
science one online think tank member, a religious kook, refused all the
data and observations. Instead offered a peace offering to rationalize
her thoughts, this allowed her to hold onto her religious beliefs in the
face of evidence, as she stated in an online think tank;
"I encourage people to make use of there own abilities as a means to resolve and adopt there own truths in life. While "you" may feel that someone has provided you with sufficient data to adopt a theory, this does not necessitate a truth for others."
This issue is not about truth in life it is about science. This is not about how one feels it is about science, observation and fact. Let's stop talking about feelings and have you put up or shut up. Then she tries to change the subject rather than acknowledging the previous research and states;
"If you have a group of 300 researchers, and this group is divided with two theories, the choices are black and white... how would you determine which theory is correct?"
Of course no one was about to allow her to change the subject without addressing the issue and one think tanker immediately challenged her:
"I believe you have no theory at all and thus you are a hypocrite beyond belief off to prove something without even studying the evidence. I am calling you a liar, a fraud and I am challenging you that you have no theory, have never read the evidence or have even heard of half these researchers who are in the top of their field before I mentioned it. In fact I will go one step further and say you will never produce anything of any value to this subject during your life time."
Wow, sounds like a little hostility towards some of these religious fanatics involved in academic research doesn't it? What are we going to do with the religious fanatics who are committing academic fraud? How can we have true and meaningful research if the data is cheated and the researchers throw away any data, which does not support their choice of a God? Do we have to get rid of all religions simply so we can move the human race forward? Apparently we do. Consider this in 2006; no more religion.
"I encourage people to make use of there own abilities as a means to resolve and adopt there own truths in life. While "you" may feel that someone has provided you with sufficient data to adopt a theory, this does not necessitate a truth for others."
This issue is not about truth in life it is about science. This is not about how one feels it is about science, observation and fact. Let's stop talking about feelings and have you put up or shut up. Then she tries to change the subject rather than acknowledging the previous research and states;
"If you have a group of 300 researchers, and this group is divided with two theories, the choices are black and white... how would you determine which theory is correct?"
Of course no one was about to allow her to change the subject without addressing the issue and one think tanker immediately challenged her:
"I believe you have no theory at all and thus you are a hypocrite beyond belief off to prove something without even studying the evidence. I am calling you a liar, a fraud and I am challenging you that you have no theory, have never read the evidence or have even heard of half these researchers who are in the top of their field before I mentioned it. In fact I will go one step further and say you will never produce anything of any value to this subject during your life time."
Wow, sounds like a little hostility towards some of these religious fanatics involved in academic research doesn't it? What are we going to do with the religious fanatics who are committing academic fraud? How can we have true and meaningful research if the data is cheated and the researchers throw away any data, which does not support their choice of a God? Do we have to get rid of all religions simply so we can move the human race forward? Apparently we do. Consider this in 2006; no more religion.
No comments:
Post a Comment